Web21 jul. 2009 · The Improved was too low in mass to match with low compliance moving coils. The mass of the 3009 and 3009 mkII were fine, but I found that the knife edge bearings and the detachable headshell reduced the dynamics and speed and softened the frequency extremes of the moving coil. This was in comparison to a Rega RB300 and a Linn Ittok. Web5 feb. 2014 · The old 4-pin arrangement on the SME 3009/3012 was poorly thought out, and resulted in loose contacts over time. It makes good sense to get it replaced by an RCA connection for which there are a few available on the net. I'd changed my own 4-pin to the one in the link below.
RCA Conversion Kit for SME 3009 / 3010 / 3012 and M2-9 / M2-10 …
WebThe II is an advance on the I, the III is a completely different. ultra-low-mass design, well suited to high-compliance carts such as. the excellent Shure V15. Second Stuart on this. … Web28 nov. 2013 · CD, and I still listen to vinyl on my 401, custom built plinth with two arms, SME 3009 II Improved – Ortofon VMS20E and a Series III and Shure V15 III. None of … closeth portatil
SME 3009 Series II Non Improved vs Improved
WebThere seems to be a plentiful supply of SME 3009 tonearms out there. Which is recommended; series I, II, or III? The II is an advance on the I, the III is a completely different ultra-low-mass design, well suited to high-compliance carts such as the excellent Shure V15. -- Stewart Pinkerton Music is Art - Audio is Engineering Harry Lavo Web18 sep. 2024 · My dear British friends keep chastising me for even thinking of trying to install a MC cartridge in my 3009. They say that there's too much mechanical energy floating … Web17 mrt. 2013 · Can anyone tell me the difference between a SME 3009R VRS 3009.I recently purchased a 3009R with a Van Der Hul silver re-wire and a brass knife bearing … closet home office ideas